Wednesday, April 1, 2026Washington, D.C.

PolicyPulse

Foreign Policy Expert Intelligence on the United States

Sources:CFRBrookingsCarnegieAtlantic CouncilChatham HouseForeign PolicyForeign AffairsEurasia GroupPIIECSIS
ANALYSIScritical

Three Scenarios for a Post-Trump World

Ten years hence, the world will look very different. A new cold war, fragmented spheres of influence, or global anarchy.

Hal Brands/Foreign Policy/March 23, 2026

“The leaders of the world's biggest economic and military power feel unconstrained by domestic or international law when it comes to waging war or toppling leaders of countries they deem to be a threat.”

Ravi Agrawal/Foreign Policy, Spring 2026

Critical

6 dispatches

“The U.S. does not possess infinite political capital, bandwidth, military capacity, or economic resilience. We are succumbing to imperial temptations.”

Fareed Zakaria/Washington Post

Developing

9 dispatches

Expert Roster

Contributing analysts & scholars

HB
Hal Brands
Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor
Johns Hopkins SAIS
SY
Sarah Yerkes
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
LRR
L. Rafael Reif
President Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
EP
Eswar Prasad
Professor of Trade Policy
Cornell University / Brookings
RA
Ravi Agrawal
Editor in Chief
Foreign Policy Magazine
MEO
Michael E. O'Hanlon
Senior Fellow & Director of Research
Brookings Institution
EA
Emma Ashford
Columnist & Senior Fellow
Foreign Policy / Stimson Center
NG
Nils Gilman
Historian & VP of Programs
Berggruen Institute

Stable

2 dispatches

“58 percent of Americans disapprove of U.S. military strikes against Iran. The war is straining alliances, creating anger among publics at home and abroad, and emboldening an Iranian leadership hostile to the United States.”

Sarah Yerkes/Carnegie Endowment

Intelligence Briefing

ANALYSISMarch 23, 2026

Three Scenarios for a Post-Trump World

The critical question, to be answered in the coming decade, is whether Washington tries to replace that world with something fraught but tolerable — or drives the present uncertainty toward something radically worse. The first scenario is a new cold war in which the United States and China coerce the rest of the world to pick a side. The second is a planet fragmented into regional spheres of influence. The third is darker still: a "self-help" world in which the United States adopts a predatory approach and the global system collapses into anarchy.

Hal Brands — Johns Hopkins SAIS — Foreign Policy
ANALYSISMarch 26, 2026

The Iran War Is Making America Less Safe

Rather than creating a world more friendly to U.S. interests, the war is disrupting U.S. alliances, empowering a regime more hostile to the United States than the one Trump sought to remove, and unleashing anti-Americanism. 58 percent of Americans disapprove of U.S. military strikes against Iran. The U.S. war with Iran is straining alliances, creating anger among publics at home and abroad, and emboldening an Iranian leadership hostile to the United States.

Sarah Yerkes — Carnegie Endowment for International Peace — Carnegie Endowment
ANALYSISApril 1, 2026

America Is Losing the Innovation Race

The United States is at risk of ceding its long-held leadership in scientific innovation to China. Federal funding cuts, restrictive immigration policies, and a hostile environment for international researchers are undermining the very ecosystem that made American innovation the envy of the world. Without urgent course correction, the consequences for U.S. economic competitiveness and national security will be severe.

L. Rafael Reif — Massachusetts Institute of Technology — Foreign Affairs
ANALYSISMarch 31, 2026

How Geopolitics Overran Globalization

The era of hyperglobalization is over. What has replaced it is a world in which economic relationships are increasingly mediated by geopolitical considerations. The United States, once the architect and guarantor of the global trading system, now sees international trade not as a public good but as a zero-sum game. This shift has profound implications for the global economy and America's place in it.

Eswar Prasad — Cornell University / Brookings — Foreign Affairs
COMMENTARYMarch 23, 2026

We're in a New World Disorder

The leaders of the world's biggest economic and military power feel unconstrained by domestic or international law when it comes to waging war or toppling leaders of countries they deem to be a threat; they no longer wish to be responsible for Europe's defense; and they see international trade not as a global public good but as a zero-sum game that must be won by any means necessary.

Ravi Agrawal — Foreign Policy Magazine — Foreign Policy

Expert Wire

Live from social media & expert platforms

GZERO Media2 hours ago

The escalating war with Iran and shifting objectives are threatening America's alliances and its domestic stability. The strategy gap is widening — we're in month two with no clear exit ramp.

Ian Bremmer·Eurasia Group
Substack12 hours ago

Living on borrowed time: The national debt is at $39 trillion. The CBO projects the federal deficit will reach $1.9 trillion in FY2026. The geopolitical risk tax will burden markets for years to come.

Richard Haass·Council on Foreign Relations
CNN / Facebook4 hours ago

The U.S. does not possess infinite political capital, bandwidth, military capacity, or economic resilience. We are succumbing to imperial temptations — and history shows where that leads.

Fareed Zakaria·CNN / Washington Post
Foreign Policy8 hours ago

No matter your politics or where you live, the United States has altered its trajectory of the last several decades. Our Spring 2026 issue, "The World After Trump," imagines where this new trajectory leads.

Ravi Agrawal·Foreign Policy Magazine
LinkedIn6 hours ago

Saudi Arabia and UAE are pushing Trump to continue the Iran war. The days in which the Middle East dominated American foreign policy — in both long-term strategy and daily bandwidth — are returning with a vengeance.

Ian Bremmer·Eurasia Group
Substack5 days ago

After close to a month of war, peace talks are being talked about, which is not quite the same thing as peace talks taking place. The gap between aspiration and reality in Iran is enormous.

Richard Haass·Council on Foreign Relations
Carnegie5 days ago

Polling from March 13-15 found 58% of Americans disapprove of U.S. military strikes against Iran. A Fox News poll found more than half believe Trump's handling of Iran has made the U.S. less safe.

Sarah Yerkes·Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Foreign Affairs1 day ago

The OECD projects the war in Iran will push U.S. inflation to 4.2% this year. The era of hyperglobalization is definitively over — geopolitics now mediates every economic relationship.

Eswar Prasad·Cornell University / Brookings
Foreign Policy8 days ago

Europe is caught between defending the rules-based order and aligning with Washington. The transatlantic alliance needs a fundamental rethink — not mourning, but reimagination.

Emma Ashford·Foreign Policy / Stimson Center
Brookings2 days ago

25% of Latino immigrants reported avoiding protests due to deportation operations. The chilling effect on civic engagement threatens the very foundations of American democracy ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Gabriel R. Sanchez·Brookings Institution
Chatham House3 weeks ago

Data centre growth could drive up electricity prices as much as 25% for some US markets by 2030. Trump's "drill, baby, drill" has not driven gas prices down — the cheapest basins are pipeline-constrained.

Zissis Marmarelis·Chatham House
Atlantic Council4 weeks ago

Khamenei is the THIRD Kremlin-backed autocrat to fall in 15 months. Assad, Maduro, now Khamenei. Moscow's reputation as a reliable ally is in tatters — consumed by Ukraine, it cannot project power elsewhere.

Brian Whitmore·Atlantic Council